Abstract
Palmatier and Rovner (2015) suggested that the Preliminary Process Theory (PPT) is a plausible theoretical account for explaining the rationale underlying two major polygraph tests, the Comparison Question Test (CQT) and the Concealed Information Test (CIT). To support their suggestion they claimed that both tests detect deception while relying on orienting responses. This approach is critically discussed. It was concluded that application of current scientific theories to polygraph diagnostic procedures should be done separately for the CIT and for the CQT. Finally, a call was extended for more research on unanswered questions in polygraph testing.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 14-15 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | International Journal of Psychophysiology |
Volume | 95 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |
Keywords
- Concealed information test
- Control question test
- Detection of deception
- Polygraph
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology (medical)
- General Neuroscience