TY - JOUR
T1 - Click-based echolocation in bats
T2 - Not so primitive after all
AU - Yovel, Yossi
AU - Geva-Sagiv, Maya
AU - Ulanovsky, Nachum
N1 - Funding Information: Acknowledgments We thank C. Moss for using her experimental setup to record some of the data reviewed here, B. Falk for help with data acquisition, J. Simmons, H.-U. Schnitzler, T. Akamatsu and K. Beedholm for discussions, R. Holland for helpful comments on the manuscript, and T. Oram for contributing to early stages of the work. This work was funded by a Human Frontiers Science Project (HFSP) grant to N.U., a Weizmann Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship to Y.Y., and a predoctoral fellowship from the Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation to M.G.-S.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Echolocating bats of the genus Rousettus produce click sonar signals, using their tongue (lingual echolocation). These signals are often considered rudimentary and are believed to enable only crude performance. However, the main argument supporting this belief, namely the click's reported long duration, was recently shown to be an artifact. In fact, the sonar clicks of Rousettus bats are extremely short, ~50-100 μs, similar to dolphin vocalizations. Here, we present a comparison between the sonar systems of the 'model species' of laryngeal echolocation, the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), and that of lingual echolocation, the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus). We show experimentally that in tasks, such as accurate landing or detection of medium-sized objects, click-based echolocation enables performance similar to laryngeal echolocators. Further, we describe a sophisticated behavioral strategy for biosonar beam steering in clicking bats. Finally, theoretical analyses of the signal design-focusing on their autocorrelations and wideband ambiguity functions-predict that in some aspects, such as target ranging and Doppler-tolerance, click-based echolocation might outperform laryngeal echolocation. Therefore, we suggest that click-based echolocation in bats should be regarded as a viable echolocation strategy, which is in fact similar to the biosonar used by most echolocating animals, including whales and dolphins.
AB - Echolocating bats of the genus Rousettus produce click sonar signals, using their tongue (lingual echolocation). These signals are often considered rudimentary and are believed to enable only crude performance. However, the main argument supporting this belief, namely the click's reported long duration, was recently shown to be an artifact. In fact, the sonar clicks of Rousettus bats are extremely short, ~50-100 μs, similar to dolphin vocalizations. Here, we present a comparison between the sonar systems of the 'model species' of laryngeal echolocation, the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus), and that of lingual echolocation, the Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus). We show experimentally that in tasks, such as accurate landing or detection of medium-sized objects, click-based echolocation enables performance similar to laryngeal echolocators. Further, we describe a sophisticated behavioral strategy for biosonar beam steering in clicking bats. Finally, theoretical analyses of the signal design-focusing on their autocorrelations and wideband ambiguity functions-predict that in some aspects, such as target ranging and Doppler-tolerance, click-based echolocation might outperform laryngeal echolocation. Therefore, we suggest that click-based echolocation in bats should be regarded as a viable echolocation strategy, which is in fact similar to the biosonar used by most echolocating animals, including whales and dolphins.
KW - Active sensing
KW - Big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus)
KW - Biosonar
KW - Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus)
KW - Signal design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955074211&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00359-011-0639-4
DO - 10.1007/s00359-011-0639-4
M3 - مقالة مرجعية
SN - 0340-7594
VL - 197
SP - 515
EP - 530
JO - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
JF - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
IS - 5
ER -