Choosing the two finalists

Kfir Eliaz; Michael Richter; Ariel Rubinstein

doi:10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3

Choosing the two finalists

Kfir Eliaz, Michael Richter, Ariel Rubinstein

School of Economics

Tel Aviv University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper studies a decision maker who for each choice set selects a subset of (at most) two alternatives. We axiomatize three types of procedures: (i) The top two: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the two maximal alternatives. (ii) The two extremes: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the maximal and the minimal alternatives. (iii) The top and the top: the decision maker has in mind two orderings and he chooses the maximal element from each.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	211-219
Number of pages	9
Journal	Economic Theory
Volume	46
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3
State	Published - Feb 2011

Keywords

Axiomatization
Choice correspondence
Consideration sets
Two-stage choice

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Economics and Econometrics

Access to Document

10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3

Cite this

@article{155038fd5ea249aca1a19f481da6c090,

title = "Choosing the two finalists",

abstract = "This paper studies a decision maker who for each choice set selects a subset of (at most) two alternatives. We axiomatize three types of procedures: (i) The top two: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the two maximal alternatives. (ii) The two extremes: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the maximal and the minimal alternatives. (iii) The top and the top: the decision maker has in mind two orderings and he chooses the maximal element from each.",

keywords = "Axiomatization, Choice correspondence, Consideration sets, Two-stage choice",

author = "Kfir Eliaz and Michael Richter and Ariel Rubinstein",

year = "2011",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3",

language = "الإنجليزيّة",

volume = "46",

pages = "211--219",

journal = "Economic Theory",

issn = "0938-2259",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Choosing the two finalists

AU - Eliaz, Kfir

AU - Richter, Michael

AU - Rubinstein, Ariel

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - This paper studies a decision maker who for each choice set selects a subset of (at most) two alternatives. We axiomatize three types of procedures: (i) The top two: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the two maximal alternatives. (ii) The two extremes: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the maximal and the minimal alternatives. (iii) The top and the top: the decision maker has in mind two orderings and he chooses the maximal element from each.

AB - This paper studies a decision maker who for each choice set selects a subset of (at most) two alternatives. We axiomatize three types of procedures: (i) The top two: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the two maximal alternatives. (ii) The two extremes: the decision maker has in mind an ordering and chooses the maximal and the minimal alternatives. (iii) The top and the top: the decision maker has in mind two orderings and he chooses the maximal element from each.

KW - Axiomatization

KW - Choice correspondence

KW - Consideration sets

KW - Two-stage choice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751576071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3

DO - 10.1007/s00199-009-0516-3

M3 - مقالة

SN - 0938-2259

VL - 46

SP - 211

EP - 219

JO - Economic Theory

JF - Economic Theory

IS - 2

ER -

Choosing the two finalists

Abstract

Keywords

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this