Abstract
Adults manifest a number of attributional biases in explaining the behavior of in- versus out-group members. The present study investigated the developmental origins of such biased explanation. Children from majority and minority populations in Israel, and from majority populations in Germany (N = 165), were asked to explain the behavior of in- and out-group members. Across ages and groups, children more often referred to group membership when explaining an out-group as compared to an in-group member’s behavior; and more often to individual factors when explaining an in-group as compared to an out-group member’s behavior. These findings are consistent with the early emergence of fundamental differences in the conceptualizations of in- and out-group members.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 684-696 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Social Development |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | Jan 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2021 |
Keywords
- behavior explanation
- cross-cultural comparison
- majority-minority children
- social categories
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Children explain in- and out-group behavior differently'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver