Can implicit bias explain generalization? Stochastic convex optimization as a case study

Assaf Dauber, Meir Feder, Tomer Koren, Roi Livni

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

Abstract

The notion of implicit bias, or implicit regularization, has been suggested as a means to explain the surprising generalization ability of modern-days overparameterized learning algorithms. This notion refers to the tendency of the optimization algorithm towards a certain structured solution that often generalizes well. Recently, several papers have studied implicit regularization and were able to identify this phenomenon in various scenarios. We revisit this paradigm in arguably the simplest non-trivial setup, and study the implicit bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in the context of Stochastic Convex Optimization. As a first step, we provide a simple construction that rules out the existence of a distribution-independent implicit regularizer that governs the generalization ability of SGD. We then demonstrate a learning problem that rules out a very general class of distribution-dependent implicit regularizers from explaining generalization, which includes strongly convex regularizers as well as non-degenerate norm-based regularizations. Certain aspects of our constructions point out to significant difficulties in providing a comprehensive explanation of an algorithm’s generalization performance by solely arguing about its implicit regularization properties.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems
Volume2020-December
StatePublished - 2020
Event34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, NeurIPS 2020 - Virtual, Online
Duration: 6 Dec 202012 Dec 2020

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems
  • Signal Processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can implicit bias explain generalization? Stochastic convex optimization as a case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this