TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders
T2 - Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical Diagnoses (A Multi-Center Study)
AU - Nykänen, Laura
AU - Sipilä, Kirsi
AU - Eli, Ilana
AU - Freidman-Rubin, Pessia
AU - Keren, Lihi
AU - Kämppi, Antti
AU - Näpänkangas, Ritva
AU - Tamar, Shalev Antshel
AU - Tanner, Johanna
AU - Teerijoki-Oksa, Tuija
AU - Winocur, Ephraim
AU - Emodi-Perlman, Alona
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2025 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: The brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (bDC/TMD) was recently published to simplify the full Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) protocol. Objective: To measure the inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity of bDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses against DC/TMD Axis I diagnoses in primary and tertiary clinic TMD patient populations. Methods: A multi-center (Finland, Israel) retrospective study on 334 patients' records was conducted. A full DC/TMD clinical examination data was reduced to bDC/TMD items. Five Level 3 calibrated examiners independently determined a bDC/TMD diagnosis. Inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for individual diagnoses, using DC/TMD diagnosis as the reference standard. Results: Inter-examiner reliability showed excellent to good reliability in all diagnoses except headache attributed to TMD, in which it was fair. Apart from headache attributed to TMD, the sensitivity of individual pain diagnoses was high. The sensitivity was lower in joint diagnoses. The specificity was high in all diagnoses. Conclusion: The bDC/TMD is a reliable instrument for general practitioner use.
AB - Background: The brief Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (bDC/TMD) was recently published to simplify the full Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) protocol. Objective: To measure the inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity of bDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses against DC/TMD Axis I diagnoses in primary and tertiary clinic TMD patient populations. Methods: A multi-center (Finland, Israel) retrospective study on 334 patients' records was conducted. A full DC/TMD clinical examination data was reduced to bDC/TMD items. Five Level 3 calibrated examiners independently determined a bDC/TMD diagnosis. Inter-examiner reliability, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for individual diagnoses, using DC/TMD diagnosis as the reference standard. Results: Inter-examiner reliability showed excellent to good reliability in all diagnoses except headache attributed to TMD, in which it was fair. Apart from headache attributed to TMD, the sensitivity of individual pain diagnoses was high. The sensitivity was lower in joint diagnoses. The specificity was high in all diagnoses. Conclusion: The bDC/TMD is a reliable instrument for general practitioner use.
KW - Axis I
KW - DC/TMD
KW - TMD
KW - instrument reliability
KW - temporomandibular disorders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002119547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/joor.13969
DO - 10.1111/joor.13969
M3 - مقالة
C2 - 40195591
SN - 0305-182X
JO - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
ER -