Abstract
Against a global backdrop of anti-refugee discourse, governments are increasingly paying refugees to repatriate. This critical ethnographic study explores the lived experiences of refugees who participated in Israel’s Voluntary Return program. The data were derived from in-depth interviews with refugees who had departed Israel. Participants highlighted the various exile-related stressors that led them to choose to leave and reflected on the ambiguity inherent in the term ‘voluntary’. Post-departure, participants continued to experience significant psychological distress. In light of popular perceptions that repatriation is an optimal solution to refugees’ displacement, the implications of these findings for interventions and policies are considered.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 526-538 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | International Social Work |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Displacement
- forced migration
- lived experiences
- mental health
- repatriation
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Voluntary Return: A critical ethnographic study of refugees who departed Israel ‘voluntarily’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver