Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Beyond the 'Sham' Critique and the Narrative of Humanitarianism: A Rejoinder to Jochen von Bernstorff.

Eyal Benvenisti, Doreen Lustig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We are very grateful to Professor von Bernstorff for taking the trouble to read and comment on our article, 1 which is a segment of a larger research project. His feedback will be invaluable in taking this project successfully to its next stage. While we could not address each and every aspect of his critique, the following response addresses four elements: the assertion that we argued that international humanitarian law (IHL) is merely a sham; his description of our historical approach as focused on the domestic; the ramifications of our historical analysis for future interpretation of IHL; and the challenge of one's Vorverständnis to historical research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)721-726
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of International Law
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2020

Keywords

  • COLLEGE teachers
  • HISTORICAL research
  • HUMANITARIAN law
  • PUBLISHED articles
  • RESEARCH

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the 'Sham' Critique and the Narrative of Humanitarianism: A Rejoinder to Jochen von Bernstorff.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this