Abstract
We are very grateful to Professor von Bernstorff for taking the trouble to read and comment on our article, 1 which is a segment of a larger research project. His feedback will be invaluable in taking this project successfully to its next stage. While we could not address each and every aspect of his critique, the following response addresses four elements: the assertion that we argued that international humanitarian law (IHL) is merely a sham; his description of our historical approach as focused on the domestic; the ramifications of our historical analysis for future interpretation of IHL; and the challenge of one's Vorverständnis to historical research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 721-726 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | European Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Sep 2020 |
Keywords
- COLLEGE teachers
- HISTORICAL research
- HUMANITARIAN law
- PUBLISHED articles
- RESEARCH
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Political Science and International Relations
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the 'Sham' Critique and the Narrative of Humanitarianism: A Rejoinder to Jochen von Bernstorff.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver