Abstract
English education policy-makers have targeted classroom time as a key area for regulation and intervention, with 'brisk pace' widely accepted as a feature of good teaching practice. We problematise this conventional wisdom through an exploration of objective and subjective dimensions of lesson pace in a corpus of 30 Key Stage 2 literacy lessons from three classrooms in one London school. Systematic classroom observation produced an anomaly: the lessons we experienced as fast-paced were rated objectively as slowest, and vice-versa. We contrasted the fastest and slowest episodes in the corpus, demonstrating that for these episodes the accepted measure of pace primarily reflected differences in utterance length. Linguistic ethnographic micro-analysis of the episodes highlighted predictability, stakes, meaning and dramatic performance as key factors contributing to pace as experienced. We argue, among other claims, that sometimes accelerating pupils' experience-and learning-necessitates slowing down the pace of teaching, and that government calls for urgency may, perversely, make lessons slower.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-106 |
Number of pages | 34 |
Journal | British Educational Research Journal |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1 Feb 2013 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Education