Abstract
We present a methodology for constructing significance tests for “difficult” composite alternative hypotheses that have no natural test statistic. We apply our methodology to construct exact tests for cross-tabulated data, and our motivating example is constructing a test for discovering Simpson’s Paradox. Our tests are Bayesian extensions of the likelihood ratio test; they are optimal with respect to the prior distribution and are also closely related to Bayes factors and Bayesian FDR controlling testing procedures.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 287-301 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Test |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 17 Oct 2015 |
Keywords
- Bayes factors
- Bayes rules
- Composite alternative hypotheses
- Exact tests
- Hypotheses testing
- Likelihood ratio tests
- Simpson’s Paradox
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Statistics and Probability
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bayesian tests for composite alternative hypotheses in cross-tabulated data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver