TY - GEN
T1 - Asymptotically optimal algorithm for stochastic adwords
AU - Devanur, Nikhil R.
AU - Sivan, Balasubramanian
AU - Azar, Yossi
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In this paper we consider the adwords problem in the unknown distribution model. We consider the case where the budget to bid ratio k is at least 2, and give improved competitive ratios. Earlier results had competitive ratios better than 1-1/e only for "large enough" k, while our competitive ratio increases continuously with k. For k=2 the competitive ratio we get is 0.729 and it is 0.9 for k=16. We also improve the asymptotic competitive ratio for large k from 1 - O(√log n/k) to 1 - O(√1/k), thus removing any dependence on n, the number of advertisers. This ratio is optimal, even with known distributions. That is, even if an algorithm is tailored to the distribution, it cannot get a competitive ratio of 1 - o(√1/k), whereas our algorithm does not depend on the distribution. The algorithm is rather simple, it computes a score for every advertiser based on his original budget, the remaining budget and the remaining number of steps in the algorithm and assigns a query to the advertiser with the highest bid plus his score. The analysis is based on a "hybrid argument" that considers algorithms that are part actual, part hypothetical, to prove that our (actual) algorithm is better than a completely hypothetical algorithm whose performance is easy to analyze.
AB - In this paper we consider the adwords problem in the unknown distribution model. We consider the case where the budget to bid ratio k is at least 2, and give improved competitive ratios. Earlier results had competitive ratios better than 1-1/e only for "large enough" k, while our competitive ratio increases continuously with k. For k=2 the competitive ratio we get is 0.729 and it is 0.9 for k=16. We also improve the asymptotic competitive ratio for large k from 1 - O(√log n/k) to 1 - O(√1/k), thus removing any dependence on n, the number of advertisers. This ratio is optimal, even with known distributions. That is, even if an algorithm is tailored to the distribution, it cannot get a competitive ratio of 1 - o(√1/k), whereas our algorithm does not depend on the distribution. The algorithm is rather simple, it computes a score for every advertiser based on his original budget, the remaining budget and the remaining number of steps in the algorithm and assigns a query to the advertiser with the highest bid plus his score. The analysis is based on a "hybrid argument" that considers algorithms that are part actual, part hypothetical, to prove that our (actual) algorithm is better than a completely hypothetical algorithm whose performance is easy to analyze.
KW - adwords
KW - online algorithms
KW - stochastic setting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863515216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1145/2229012.2229043
DO - https://doi.org/10.1145/2229012.2229043
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
SN - 9781450314152
T3 - Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
SP - 388
EP - 404
BT - EC '12 - Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
T2 - 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC '12
Y2 - 4 June 2012 through 8 June 2012
ER -