Abstract
This randomized controlled experiment (N = 707) is the first to examine the role of video, source and user attributes in credibility assessment of online science news videos, and the impact of web-search on this role. We created a science news YouTube video in 12 versions (3 × 2 × 2 for source, quality and popularity). Each participant was randomly assigned to one version and was asked to rate the credibility of the source and the scientific information presented in the video. We found that perceived credibility is positively associated with perceived quality, as well as users’ YouTube experience. For those participants who did not conduct an online search during the assessment task, there was a positive association between the presenter’s perceived credibility and the video’s perceived credibility as well as its popularity; however, such associations were not present for participants who did conduct an online search.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 376-391 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Public Understanding of Science |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 May 2020 |
Keywords
- discourses of science
- media and science
- media representations
- popularization of science
- public understanding of science
- representations of science
- science and popular culture
- science communication
- science education
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Communication
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing YouTube science news’ credibility: The impact of web-search on the role of video, source, and user attributes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver