Abstract
This paper reports a study using a quasi-experimental design to examine whether an academic writing course in English can improve graduate students’ academic and popular science writing skills. To address this issue, we designed pre- and post-assessment tasks, an intervention assessment task and a scoring rubric. The pre- and post-assessment tasks included writing in contrasting genres, i.e. an academic paper abstract to assess academic writing and a press release to assess popular science writing. Students’ pre- and post-assessment tasks were rated using a newly developed rubric addressing English proficiency, and academic and popular science writing skills. The rubric was based on course material, previous research and a pilot study. The study analysed 177 non-native English science and engineering graduate students’ writing in a compulsory Academic Writing in English course at the beginning and end of a 14-week semester. Findings indicated significant improvement in academic and popular science writing, as well as improvement in students’ English language proficiency.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 48-66 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Educational Psychology |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2 Jan 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Academic writing
- L2 writing
- graduate writing
- popular science
- science communication
- scoring rubrics
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing and improving L2 graduate students’ popular science and academic writing in an academic writing course'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver