Are managers strategic in reporting non-earnings news? Evidence on timing and news bundling

Benjamin Segal, Dan Segal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Using a comprehensive sample of non-earnings 8-K filings from 2005 to 2013, we examine whether firms strategically report mandatory and voluntary news. In particular, we examine whether firms report negative news when investor attention is low and whether they bundle positive and negative news. Our findings support the notion that managers believe in the existence of investor inattention and strategically report negative news after trading hours. These results particularly apply to public firms, where equity market pressures provide stronger incentives to mitigate market reaction to news by exploiting investor inattention. Further analysis of the market reaction to strategic disclosure uncovers no evidence of investor inattention, consistent with market efficiency. We also observe that public firms are more likely to strategically disclose through news bundling and that the likelihood of this increases with the likelihood of strategic disclosure through timing.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)1203-1244
Number of pages42
JournalReview of Accounting Studies
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • General Business,Management and Accounting


Dive into the research topics of 'Are managers strategic in reporting non-earnings news? Evidence on timing and news bundling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this