Analysing openly recorded preinterview deliberations to detect deceit in collective interviews

Aldert Vrij, Louise Marie Jupe, Sharon Leal, Zarah Vernham, Galit Nahari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sham marriages occur frequently, and to detect them, partners are sometimes interviewed together. We examined an innovative method to detect deceit in such interviews. Fifty-three pairs of interviewees, either friends (truth tellers) or pretended to be friends (liars), were interviewed about their friendship. Just before the interview, they received the questions that would be asked in the interview and were invited to prepare the answers. We told them that these preinterview deliberations would be recorded. Based on the transcripts, we analysed cues to truthfulness (cues expected to be expressed more by truth tellers) and cues to deceit (cues expected to be expressed more by liars). Truth tellers and liars differed from each other, particularly regarding expressing cues to truthfulness. Preinterview deliberations that are recorded with awareness of the interviewees can be used for lie detection purposes. We discuss further venues in this new line of research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)132-141
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • collective interviewing
  • deception
  • verbal cues to deception

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysing openly recorded preinterview deliberations to detect deceit in collective interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this