TY - GEN
T1 - An optimal private stochastic-MAB algorithm based on an optimal private stopping rule
AU - Sajed, Touqir
AU - Sheffet, Or
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2019 International Machine Learning Society (IMLS).
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - We present a provably optimal differentially private algorithm for the stochastic multi-arm bandit problem, as opposed to the private analogue of the UCB-algorithm (Mishra and Thakurta, 2015; Tossou and Dimitrakakis, 2016) which doesn't meet the recently discovered lower-bound of ω(Klog(T)/ϵ) (Shariff and Sheffet, 2018). Our construction is based on a different algorithm, Successive Elimination (Even-Dar et al., 2002), that repeatedly pulls all remaining arms until an arm is found to be suboptimal and is then eliminated. In order to devise a private analogue of Successive Elimination we visit the problem of private stopping rule, that takes as input a stream of i.i.d samples from an unknown distribution and returns a multiplicative (1 ± α)-approximation of the distribution's mean, and prove the optimality of our private stopping rule. We then present the private Successive Elimination algorithm which meets both the non-private lower bound (Lai and Robbins, 1985) and the above-mentioned private lower bound. We also compare empirically the performance of our algorithm with the private UCB algorithm.
AB - We present a provably optimal differentially private algorithm for the stochastic multi-arm bandit problem, as opposed to the private analogue of the UCB-algorithm (Mishra and Thakurta, 2015; Tossou and Dimitrakakis, 2016) which doesn't meet the recently discovered lower-bound of ω(Klog(T)/ϵ) (Shariff and Sheffet, 2018). Our construction is based on a different algorithm, Successive Elimination (Even-Dar et al., 2002), that repeatedly pulls all remaining arms until an arm is found to be suboptimal and is then eliminated. In order to devise a private analogue of Successive Elimination we visit the problem of private stopping rule, that takes as input a stream of i.i.d samples from an unknown distribution and returns a multiplicative (1 ± α)-approximation of the distribution's mean, and prove the optimality of our private stopping rule. We then present the private Successive Elimination algorithm which meets both the non-private lower bound (Lai and Robbins, 1985) and the above-mentioned private lower bound. We also compare empirically the performance of our algorithm with the private UCB algorithm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078258451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - منشور من مؤتمر
T3 - 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019
SP - 9791
EP - 9800
BT - 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019
T2 - 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019
Y2 - 9 June 2019 through 15 June 2019
ER -