Abstract
This chapter discusses the difficulty faced by therapists when, instead of a story of emotional problems, they are presented in the course of a professional consultation with a narrative about social injustice. The chapter includes a detailed analysis of a single intake session and subsequent post-intake interviews, taken from a large study on intakes in mental health clinics with culturally diverse populations in Israel. The client–subject of this chapter presented herself to a mental health facility, claiming a state of crisis due to the downgrading of her employment status, which she attributed to systematic corporate injustice. During the intake interview, there were a number of disagreements between the client and the therapist. While the client sought to relate a narrative of injustice, the therapist insisted on identifying an illness narrative. This chapter argues that the battle of narratives is a political battle, and highlights the political power wielded by therapists in defining diagnoses and treatment recommendations.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Illness Narratives in Practice |
Subtitle of host publication | Potentials and Challenges of Using Narratives in Health-related Contexts |
Editors | Christine Holmberg, Thorsten Meyer, Gabriele Lucius-Hoene |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Chapter | 7 |
Pages | 75–86 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191844225 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780198806660 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2018 |