Abstract
We show that our item-based model, competitive guided search, accounts for the empirical patterns that Hulleman & Olivers (H&O) invoke against item-based models, and we highlight recently reported diagnostic data that challenge their approach. We advise against "forsaking the item" unless and until a full fixation-based model is shown to be superior to extant item-based models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e148 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience