Abstract
We show that our item-based model, competitive guided search, accounts for the empirical patterns that Hulleman & Olivers (H&O) invoke against item-based models, and we highlight recently reported diagnostic data that challenge their approach. We advise against "forsaking the item" unless and until a full fixation-based model is shown to be superior to extant item-based models.
| Original language | English GB |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e148 |
| Journal | Behavioral and Brain Sciences |
| Volume | 40 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An appeal against the item's death sentence: Accounting for diagnostic data patterns with an item-based model of visual search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver