TY - JOUR
T1 - Algorithmic aspects of property testing in the dense graphs model
AU - Goldreich, Oded
AU - Ron, Dana
N1 - Israel Science Foundation [460/05, 1041/08, 89/05, 246/08]Department of Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel ([email protected]). This author's research was partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grants 460/05 and 1041/08).School of Electrical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel ([email protected]). This author's research was partially supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grants 89/05 and 246/08).
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - In this paper we consider two basic questions regarding the query complexity of testing graph properties in the adjacency matrix model. The first question refers to the relation between adaptive and nonadaptive testers, whereas the second question refers to testability within complexity that is inversely proportional to the proximity parameter, denoted ε. The study of these questions reveals the importance of algorithmic design in this model. The highlights of our study are as follows: (a) A gap between the complexity of adaptive and nonadaptive testers. Specifically, there exists a natural graph property that can be tested using Õ(ε-1) adaptive queries but cannot be tested using o(ε-3/2) nonadaptive queries. (b) In contrast, there exist natural graph properties that can be tested using Õ(ε-1) nonadaptive queries, whereas τ(ε -1) queries are required even in the adaptive case. We mention that the properties used in the foregoing conflicting results have a similar flavor, although they are of course different.
AB - In this paper we consider two basic questions regarding the query complexity of testing graph properties in the adjacency matrix model. The first question refers to the relation between adaptive and nonadaptive testers, whereas the second question refers to testability within complexity that is inversely proportional to the proximity parameter, denoted ε. The study of these questions reveals the importance of algorithmic design in this model. The highlights of our study are as follows: (a) A gap between the complexity of adaptive and nonadaptive testers. Specifically, there exists a natural graph property that can be tested using Õ(ε-1) adaptive queries but cannot be tested using o(ε-3/2) nonadaptive queries. (b) In contrast, there exist natural graph properties that can be tested using Õ(ε-1) nonadaptive queries, whereas τ(ε -1) queries are required even in the adaptive case. We mention that the properties used in the foregoing conflicting results have a similar flavor, although they are of course different.
KW - Adaptivity versus nonadaptivity
KW - Graph properties
KW - Property testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957461140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1137/090749621
DO - https://doi.org/10.1137/090749621
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0097-5397
VL - 40
SP - 376
EP - 445
JO - SIAM Journal on Computing
JF - SIAM Journal on Computing
IS - 2
ER -