TY - JOUR
T1 - Advanced near-zero waste treatment of food processing wastewater with water, carbon, and nutrient recovery
AU - Grossman, Amit Dan
AU - Belete, Yonas Zeslase
AU - Boussiba, Sammy
AU - Yogev, Uri
AU - Posten, Clemens
AU - Ortiz Tena, Franziska
AU - Thomsen, Laurenz
AU - Wang, Song
AU - Gross, Amit
AU - Leu, Stefan
AU - Bernstein, Roy
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021
PY - 2021/7/20
Y1 - 2021/7/20
N2 - A near-zero waste treatment system for food processing wastewater was developed and studied. The wastewater was treated using an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), polished using an outdoor photobioreactor for microalgae cultivation (three species were studied), and excess sludge was treated using hydrothermal carbonization. The study was conducted under arid climate conditions for one year (four seasons). The AnMBR reduced the total organic carbon by 97%, which was mostly recovered as methane (~57%) and hydrochar (~4%). Microalgal biomass productivity in the AnMBR effluent ranged from 0.25 to 0.8 g·L−1·day−1. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) uptake varied seasonally, from 18 to 45 mg·L−1·day−1 and up to 5 mg·L−1·day−1, respectively. N and P mass balance analysis demonstrated that the process was highly efficient in the recovery of nitrogen (~77%), and phosphorus (~91%). The performance of the microalgal culture changed among seasons because of climatic variation, as a result of variation in the wastewater chemistry, and possibly due to differences among the microalgal species. Effluent standards for irrigation use were met throughout the year and were achieved within two days in summer and 4.5 days in winter. Overall, the study demonstrated a near-zero waste discharge system capable of producing high-quality effluent, achieving nutrient and carbon recovery into microalgae biomass, and energy production as biogas and hydrochar.
AB - A near-zero waste treatment system for food processing wastewater was developed and studied. The wastewater was treated using an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR), polished using an outdoor photobioreactor for microalgae cultivation (three species were studied), and excess sludge was treated using hydrothermal carbonization. The study was conducted under arid climate conditions for one year (four seasons). The AnMBR reduced the total organic carbon by 97%, which was mostly recovered as methane (~57%) and hydrochar (~4%). Microalgal biomass productivity in the AnMBR effluent ranged from 0.25 to 0.8 g·L−1·day−1. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) uptake varied seasonally, from 18 to 45 mg·L−1·day−1 and up to 5 mg·L−1·day−1, respectively. N and P mass balance analysis demonstrated that the process was highly efficient in the recovery of nitrogen (~77%), and phosphorus (~91%). The performance of the microalgal culture changed among seasons because of climatic variation, as a result of variation in the wastewater chemistry, and possibly due to differences among the microalgal species. Effluent standards for irrigation use were met throughout the year and were achieved within two days in summer and 4.5 days in winter. Overall, the study demonstrated a near-zero waste discharge system capable of producing high-quality effluent, achieving nutrient and carbon recovery into microalgae biomass, and energy production as biogas and hydrochar.
KW - Anaerobic membrane bioreactor
KW - Food industry wastewater
KW - Hydrothermal carbonization
KW - Microalgae cultivation
KW - Nutrient recovery
KW - Outdoor photobioreactor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102877730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146373
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146373
M3 - Article
C2 - 34030249
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 779
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 146373
ER -