Abstract
I investigate the historical development of limited liability - widely considered a cornerstone of the business corporation - and challenge the commonplace linear narratives about how limited liability evolved. I dismiss the claim that limited liability was invented with the very first joint-stock business corporations around 1600. I also reject the assertion that it became dominant with the limited liability acts of the mid-19th century. My argument is that it was only around 1800 that limited liability became a separate corporate attribute, distinct from legal personality, and that limited liability in the modern sense became a uniform attribute of all corporations only in the 20th century. Since corporations, stock markets and the corporate economy enjoyed a long and prosperous history well before limited liability in its modern sense became established and dominant, the economic theory of limited liability needs to be revisited. The paper opens a new set of conceptual, empirical and theoretical research questions, and points to new possibilities in terms of viable future liability regimes.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 643-664 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Journal of Institutional Economics |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- Corporate law
- corporations
- entity shielding
- institutional economics
- joint-stock companies
- limited liability
- owner shielding
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Economics,Econometrics and Finance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A new understanding of the history of limited liability: An invitation for theoretical reframing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver