TY - JOUR
T1 - A Functional Gradient in the Rodent Prefrontal Cortex Supports Behavioral Inhibition
AU - Hardung, Stefanie
AU - Epple, Robert
AU - Jaeckel, Zoe
AU - Eriksson, David
AU - Uran, Cem
AU - Senn, Verena
AU - Gibor, Lihi
AU - Yizhar, Ofer
AU - Diester, Ilka
N1 - Minna-James-Heineman Foundation; BrainLinks-Brain-Tools; Cluster of Excellence - German Research Foundation (DFG) [EXC 1086]; Bernstein Award - Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GQ1301]; ERC Starting Grant [OptoMotorPath 338041]; FENS-Kavli Network of Excellence (FKNE); DFG [DI 1908/5-1, DI 1908/6-1, SE 2423/1-1] The authors would like to thank all reviewers for their detailed and helpful comments and suggestions on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Minna-James-Heineman Foundation, BrainLinks-Brain-Tools, Cluster of Excellence funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; grant no. EXC 1086), the Bernstein Award 2012 sponsored by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant no. 01GQ1301), ERC Starting Grant OptoMotorPath 338041, and the FENS-Kavli Network of Excellence (FKNE; all to I.D.), as well as DFG grant nos. DI 1908/5-1, DI 1908/6-1 (both to I.D), and SE 2423/1-1 (to V.S.).
PY - 2017/2/20
Y1 - 2017/2/20
N2 - The ability to plan and execute appropriately timed responses to external stimuli is based on a well-orchestrated balance between movement initiation and inhibition. In impulse control disorders involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [1], this balance is disturbed, emphasizing the critical role that PFC plays in appropriately timing actions [2-4]. Here, we employed optogenetic and electro-physiological techniques to systematically analyze the functional role of five key subareas of the rat medial PFC (mPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in action control [5-9]. Inactivation of mPFC subareas induced drastic changes in performance, namely an increase (prelimbic cortex, PL) or decrease (infralimbic cortex, IL) of premature responses. Additionally, electrophysiology revealed a significant decrease in neuronal activity of a PL subpopulation prior to premature responses. In contrast, inhibition of OFC subareas (mainly the ventral OFC, i.e., VO) significantly impaired the ability to respond rapidly after external cues. Consistent with these findings, mPFC activity during response preparation predicted trial outcomes and reaction times significantly better than OFC activity. These data support the concept of opposing roles of IL and PL in directing proactive behavior and argue for an involvement of OFC in predominantly reactive movement control. By attributing defined roles to rodent PFC sections, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the functional heterogeneity of this brain area and thus may guide medically relevant studies of PFC-associated impulse control disorders in this animal model for neural disorders [10-12].
AB - The ability to plan and execute appropriately timed responses to external stimuli is based on a well-orchestrated balance between movement initiation and inhibition. In impulse control disorders involving the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [1], this balance is disturbed, emphasizing the critical role that PFC plays in appropriately timing actions [2-4]. Here, we employed optogenetic and electro-physiological techniques to systematically analyze the functional role of five key subareas of the rat medial PFC (mPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in action control [5-9]. Inactivation of mPFC subareas induced drastic changes in performance, namely an increase (prelimbic cortex, PL) or decrease (infralimbic cortex, IL) of premature responses. Additionally, electrophysiology revealed a significant decrease in neuronal activity of a PL subpopulation prior to premature responses. In contrast, inhibition of OFC subareas (mainly the ventral OFC, i.e., VO) significantly impaired the ability to respond rapidly after external cues. Consistent with these findings, mPFC activity during response preparation predicted trial outcomes and reaction times significantly better than OFC activity. These data support the concept of opposing roles of IL and PL in directing proactive behavior and argue for an involvement of OFC in predominantly reactive movement control. By attributing defined roles to rodent PFC sections, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the functional heterogeneity of this brain area and thus may guide medically relevant studies of PFC-associated impulse control disorders in this animal model for neural disorders [10-12].
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012922673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.052
DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.052
M3 - مقالة
SN - 0960-9822
VL - 27
SP - 549
EP - 555
JO - Current Biology
JF - Current Biology
IS - 4
ER -