TY - JOUR
T1 - A cross-linguistic study of the acquisition of clitic and pronoun production
AU - Varlokosta, Spyridoula
AU - Belletti, Adriana
AU - Costa, João
AU - Friedmann, Naama
AU - Gavarró, Anna
AU - Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
AU - Guasti, Maria Teresa
AU - Tuller, Laurice
AU - Lobo, Maria
AU - Anđelković, Darinka
AU - Argemí, Núria
AU - Avram, Larisa
AU - Berends, Sanne
AU - Brunetto, Valentina
AU - Delage, Hélène
AU - Ezeizabarrena, María José
AU - Fattal, Iris
AU - Haman, Ewa
AU - van Hout, Angeliek
AU - de López, Kristine Jensen
AU - Katsos, Napoleon
AU - Kologranic, Lana
AU - Krstić, Nadezda
AU - Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac
AU - Miękisz, Aneta
AU - Nerantzini, Michaela
AU - Queraltó, Clara
AU - Radic, Zeljana
AU - Ruiz, Sílvia
AU - Sauerland, Uli
AU - Sevcenco, Anca
AU - Smoczyńska, Magdalena
AU - Theodorou, Eleni
AU - van der Lely, Heather
AU - Veenstra, Alma
AU - Weston, John
AU - Yachini, Maya
AU - Yatsushiro, Kazuko
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2016 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2016/1/2
Y1 - 2016/1/2
N2 - ABSTRACT: This study develops a single elicitation method to test the acquisition of third-person pronominal objects in 5-year-olds for 16 languages. This methodology allows us to compare the acquisition of pronominals in languages that lack object clitics (“pronoun languages”) with languages that employ clitics in the relevant context (“clitic languages”), thus establishing a robust cross-linguistic baseline in the domain of clitic and pronoun production for 5-year-olds. High rates of pronominal production are found in our results, indicating that children have the relevant pragmatic knowledge required to select a pronominal in the discourse setting involved in the experiment as well as the relevant morphosyntactic knowledge involved in the production of pronominals. It is legitimate to conclude from our data that a child who at age 5 is not able to produce any or few pronominals is a child at risk for language impairment. In this way, pronominal production can be taken as a developmental marker, provided that one takes into account certain cross-linguistic differences discussed in the article.
AB - ABSTRACT: This study develops a single elicitation method to test the acquisition of third-person pronominal objects in 5-year-olds for 16 languages. This methodology allows us to compare the acquisition of pronominals in languages that lack object clitics (“pronoun languages”) with languages that employ clitics in the relevant context (“clitic languages”), thus establishing a robust cross-linguistic baseline in the domain of clitic and pronoun production for 5-year-olds. High rates of pronominal production are found in our results, indicating that children have the relevant pragmatic knowledge required to select a pronominal in the discourse setting involved in the experiment as well as the relevant morphosyntactic knowledge involved in the production of pronominals. It is legitimate to conclude from our data that a child who at age 5 is not able to produce any or few pronominals is a child at risk for language impairment. In this way, pronominal production can be taken as a developmental marker, provided that one takes into account certain cross-linguistic differences discussed in the article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959097429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2015.1028628
DO - https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2015.1028628
M3 - مقالة
SN - 1048-9223
VL - 23
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - Language Acquisition
JF - Language Acquisition
IS - 1
ER -