Abstract
AIM: This study investigates the accuracy of an apex locator in mature andimmature teeth with divergent root canals ex vivo.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty extracted premolar teeth were utilized for the study, with 25 mature teeth (Nolla stage 9 or 10) and 25 immature teeth (Nolla stages ≤ 8). The discrepancies between the actual length (AL) and the electronic length (EL), measured using a Bingo 1020 apex locator, were compared and analyzed. Statistical analysis included Pearson's correlation analysis, a T-test for independent samples, and multiple linear regression. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.RESULTS: The difference between AL and EL in immature teeth was significantly higher than in mature premolar teeth. Nonetheless, patient gender or jaw type (upper/lower) did not affect the accuracy of electronic apex locator (EAL) measurements.CONCLUSION: EAL readings are less accurate in immature teeth than in mature teeth. Supplementary measures, such as radiographic length determination and wet-dry paper point tests, are required to confirm theworking length for improved treatment outcomes and patient compliance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e69116-e69116 |
| Journal | Cureus |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparative Ex Vivo Study on Apex Locator Precision in Mature Teeth and Immature Teeth With Divergent Canals.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver