פוליטיקה נגיפית של חרדה קיומית: בין התנגדות איתנה לחסינות גמישה

Translated title of the contribution: The Pandemic Politics of Existential Anxiety: Between Steadfast Resistance and Flexible Resilience

אוריאל אבולוף, שירלי לפן, בונאן פו

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We all know we will die, but not when and how. Can private death awareness become public, and what happens when it does? This mixed-method research on the Covid-19 crisis reveals how pandemic politics cultivate and use mass existential anxiety. Analyzing global discourse across vast corpora, we reveal an exceptional rise in global ‘mortality salience’ (awareness of death), and trace the socio-political dynamics feeding it. Comparing governmental pandemic policies worldwide, we introduce a novel model discerning ‘mortality mitigation’(coping mechanisms) on a scale from steadfast resistance (‘oak’) to flexible resilience (‘reed’). We find that political trust, high median age, and social anxiety predict a reedy approach; and that the oak, typically pushing for stricter measures, mitigates mortality better. Stringency itself, however, hardly affectsCovid-19 related cases/deaths. We enrich our model with brief illustrations from five countries: China and Israel (both oaks), Sweden and Germany (reeds) and the USA (a hybrid of oak and reed)
Translated title of the contributionThe Pandemic Politics of Existential Anxiety: Between Steadfast Resistance and Flexible Resilience
Original languageHebrew
Pages (from-to)37-56
Number of pages20
Journalהמרחב הציבורי
Volume16
StatePublished - 2023

IHP publications

  • ihp
  • Adjustment (Psychology)
  • Anxiety
  • COVID-19 (Disease)
  • COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-
  • Crisis management
  • Epidemics
  • Mortality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Pandemic Politics of Existential Anxiety: Between Steadfast Resistance and Flexible Resilience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this