Abstract
Literature on AI ethics tends to examine the subject through philosophical, legal, or technocratic perspectives, largely neglecting the socio-cultural one. This literature also overwhelmingly focuses on the US. Aiming to fill these gaps, this article explores how Israeli data scientists understand, interpret,and depict algorithmic ethics. Based on a pragmatist sociological analysis of 60semi-structured interviews, we ask: which ideologies, discourses and worldviews construct algorithmic ethics? Our findings point to three dominant moral logics:A) ethics as a personal endeavor; B) ethics as hindering progress; and C) ethics as a commodity. We show that while data science is a nascent profession, these moral logics originate from the techno-libertarian culture of its parent-profession –engineering, and they accordingly prevent the institutionalization of an agreed-upon moral regime. Thus, this paper offers to see algorithmic ethics in a contextualized perspective and explore how data scientists practically see and construct their ethics.
| Translated title of the contribution | What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Algorithmic Ethics? The Case of Israeli Data Scientists |
|---|---|
| Original language | Hebrew |
| Pages (from-to) | 171-191 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | סוציולוגיה ישראלית: כתב-עת לחקר החברה הישראלית |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2021 |
IHP publications
- ihp
- Algorithms
- Big data
- Databases
- Ethics
- Information science
- Information technology
- Professional ethics
- Professions
- big data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Algorithmic Ethics? The Case of Israeli Data Scientists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver