Retest Reliability of Integrated Speed–Accuracy Measures

Tamar Bakun Emesh, Dror Garbi, Alon Kaplan, Hila Zelicha, Anat Yaskolka Meir, Gal Tsaban, Ehud Rinott, Nachshon Meiran

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالةمراجعة النظراء


Cognitive tasks borrowed from experimental psychology are often used to assess individual differences. A cardinal issue of this transition from experimental to correlational designs is reduced retest reliability of some well-established cognitive effects as well as speed–accuracy trade-off. The present study aimed to address these issues by examining the retest reliability of various methods for speed–accuracy integration and by comparing between two types of task modeling: difference scores and residual scores. Results from three studies on executive functions show that (a) integrated speed–accuracy scoring is generally more reliable as compared with nonintegrated methods: mean response time and accuracy; and (b) task modeling, especially residual scores, reduced reliability. We thus recommend integrating speed and accuracy, at least for measuring executive functions.

اللغة الأصليةإنجليزيّة أمريكيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)717-730
عدد الصفحات14
مستوى الصوت29
رقم الإصدار4
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - 1 يونيو 2022

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • !!Clinical Psychology
  • !!Applied Psychology


أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Retest Reliability of Integrated Speed–Accuracy Measures'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا