Quality assessment of observational studies in psychiatry: An examplefrom perinatal psychiatric research

L. E. Ross, S. Grigoriadis, L. Mamisashvili, G. Koren, M. Steiner, C. L. Dennis, A. Cheung, P. Mousmanis

نتاج البحث: نشر في مجلةمقالةمراجعة النظراء

ملخص

In perinatal psychiatry, randomized controlled trials are often not feasible on ethical grounds. Many studies are observational in nature, while others employ large databases not designed primarily for research purposes. Quality assessment of the resulting research is complicated by a lack of standardized tools specifically for this purpose. The aim of this paper is to describe the Systematic Assessment of Quality in Observational Research (SAQOR), a quality assessment tool our team devised for a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of evidence-based literature regarding risks and benefits of antidepressant medication during pregnancy.

اللغة الأصليةالإنجليزيّة
الصفحات (من إلى)224-234
عدد الصفحات11
دوريةInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
مستوى الصوت20
رقم الإصدار4
المعرِّفات الرقمية للأشياء
حالة النشرنُشِر - ديسمبر 2011
منشور خارجيًانعم

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • !!Psychiatry and Mental health

بصمة

أدرس بدقة موضوعات البحث “Quality assessment of observational studies in psychiatry: An examplefrom perinatal psychiatric research'. فهما يشكلان معًا بصمة فريدة.

قم بذكر هذا